header-left
File #: 17-695    Version: 1 Name: County Code Chapter 16, article II
Type: Ordinance Status: Adopted
In control: County Counsel
On agenda: 9/26/2017 Final action: 9/26/2017
Title: Adopt a technical correction ordinance amending Solano County Code Chapter 16, article II, section 16-20, relating to the name of the juvenile treatment facility program
District: All
Attachments: 1. A - Ordinance, 2. Adopted Ordinance, 3. Minute Order
title
Adopt a technical correction ordinance amending Solano County Code Chapter 16, article II, section 16-20, relating to the name of the juvenile treatment facility program

body
Published Notice Required? Yes ____ No _X _
Public Hearing Required? Yes ____ No _X _

DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the proposed ordinance amending Solano County Code Chapter 16, article II, section 16-20, relating to the name of the juvenile treatment facility program.

SUMMARY:

The existing Chapter 16, article II, section 16-20 references the defunct juvenile treatment facility program. The program known as New Foundations has been replaced by the Challenge Academy of Solano County. Correcting this information will provide accuracy to our code references and ensure the Probation Department's continued eligibility for funding the juvenile treatment facility.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

No financial impact to the general fund.

DISCUSSION:

This ordinance proposes a technical correction to the County Code to ensure accuracy and administrative efficiency.

Welfare & Institutions Code section 881 authorizes counties to establish, by ordinance, camps, ranches, and other facilities for the treatment of juveniles. The Solano County Board of Supervisors previously authorized the establishment of such a facility. Recently, the Probation Department changed its juvenile treatment facility program from New Foundations to the Challenge Academy of Solano County. This technical correction will change the County Code to replace the name of the former treatment program with the new program and ensure that State funding of the juvenile treatment facility is not interrupted.

ALTERNATIVES:

The Board could reject the proposed technical change, but this is not recommended because we need to retain State funding and provide accurate and reliable code references.

OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT:

We consulted with the Chief Probation Officer.

CAO RECOMMENDATION:

APPROVE DEPARTMENTAL RECO...

Click here for full text